|
Post by redwings8831 on Jan 14, 2013 16:54:18 GMT -5
Will advance at some point tonight but was wondering if anyone would be opposed to switching up the format? Maybe go 1 star coordinators or something different.
|
|
|
Post by michwolverine84 on Jan 14, 2013 16:59:49 GMT -5
I'm down
|
|
|
Post by killacam57 on Jan 14, 2013 17:03:24 GMT -5
Yea, I'd be interested in changing it up. What exactly were you thinking? I think it would be cool to be in the same conference again. As I mentioned, maybe the MAC?
|
|
|
Post by deadrabbits23 on Jan 14, 2013 17:08:36 GMT -5
Will advance at some point tonight but was wondering if anyone would be opposed to switching up the format? Maybe go 1 star coordinators or something different. Doesn't matter to me. I'm down with whatever.
|
|
|
Post by ziff72 on Jan 14, 2013 17:13:16 GMT -5
Not sure what "1 star coordinators" is exactly for our dynasty but I'm pretty open if you want to sell it. Here are my bullets for what I prefer, but I'm a conformist I'll bow to the will of the people.
-I enjoy developing a team so I'd like to continue with my current roster for the time being.
-I have been pretty consistent in trying to restrain the rosters so I'm all for playing with lesser teams or whatever. I think the real fun is in looking for match ups and trying to exploit or cover up for those. I'd prefer waiting for 2014 or start scaling back recruiting to accomplish it this year, I like my guys too much to say goodbye.
-I enjoy the recruiting and I like the user match ups so the more of those the better for me.
-Finding guys to be committed to the dynasty has proven difficult so while I would like to add more guys for variety I'm fine with keeping it the same if we have to get desperate. Better smaller with committed guys than a guy half assing it. Losing Beef and Hez was tough as they were some of the most involved guys, but we have a pretty good core group.
|
|
|
Post by killacam57 on Jan 14, 2013 17:20:30 GMT -5
I agree with Ziff on the additions of new members. Fine with it, but I like our committed group as well. I'm all for a change, but I'm curious what the 1 star coordinators idea is about a well. Sounds interesting.
|
|
|
Post by killacam57 on Jan 14, 2013 17:23:53 GMT -5
Also, it would be nice to keep the same group for the sake of advancing quickly.
|
|
|
Post by Janksteak on Jan 14, 2013 17:28:48 GMT -5
I'm down if 1 star coordinators means taking over new MAC style schools. I think it would be a fun change-up and everyone seems on board, Ziff come and join us. One of us! One of us!
In regards to new members, I love the idea of having a full league it just needs the right people. Not sure how best to find committed people but it is beyond annoying when we find someone, get them started up and then they hold up the dynasty before eventually quitting. We could post a thread on mgoblog and do some more screening questions while we continue to advance with our current group
|
|
|
Post by camkp on Jan 14, 2013 17:41:52 GMT -5
I'm in favor of a change as well
|
|
|
Post by michwolverine84 on Jan 14, 2013 17:42:05 GMT -5
I think the Mac school idea works. I'm down with change.
|
|
|
Post by killacam57 on Jan 14, 2013 18:00:14 GMT -5
How would we figure out who gets who in the MAC. It woul be cool to get this in motion tonight.
|
|
|
Post by bjams03 on Jan 14, 2013 18:00:19 GMT -5
I'm cool with whatever.....like Ziff, really like the Utah team I have built and enjoy playing with them (prob cause I haven't even one a division title), but, want to keep the league fun for everyone. I've never used anything but HC, if we use OC's, does that mean we don't play defense?
|
|
|
Post by redwings8831 on Jan 14, 2013 18:11:49 GMT -5
I'm cool with whatever.....like Ziff, really like the Utah team I have built and enjoy playing with them (prob cause I haven't even one a division title), but, want to keep the league fun for everyone. I've never used anything but HC, if we use OC's, does that mean we don't play defense? You would only play your side of the ball vs the CPU. Against other users, it would be just like if you are the HC. I don't even know if this is an option for a dynasty that has already been started. As for the number, it's staying at 9 unless Beef or Hez want to rejoin. Coordinators would turn on the coaching carousel (if possible) and you would be building up your coach.
|
|
|
Post by killacam57 on Jan 14, 2013 18:18:59 GMT -5
I'm cool with whatever.....like Ziff, really like the Utah team I have built and enjoy playing with them (prob cause I haven't even one a division title), but, want to keep the league fun for everyone. I've never used anything but HC, if we use OC's, does that mean we don't play defense? You would only play your side of the ball vs the CPU. Against other users, it would be just like if you are the HC. I don't even know if this is an option for a dynasty that has already been started. As for the number, it's staying at 9 unless Beef or Hez want to rejoin. Coordinators would turn on the coaching carousel (if possible) and you would be building up your coach. Interesting. Personally, I would like to keep HC duties at all times,but if others are up for it...
|
|
|
Post by michwolverine84 on Jan 14, 2013 18:19:18 GMT -5
Well lets get the wheels turning haha
|
|